My Links

Bloggernacle Links

  • Mormon Archipelago
  • Mormon Blogs
  • LDSelect
  • LDS Blogs

Article Categories

Post Categories

Archives

Other LDS Blogs

Our Individual Blogs

The "Light" vs The "Limelight"

By: The Baron

Among famous Mormons with high name recognition (excluding recent presidential candidates), retired QB Steve Young probably still ranks near the top, even among non-football fans.

During his Hall of Fame NFL career, Steve Young was widely celebrated both for on-the-field accomplishments, and additionally for being an 'ambassador' for the Church--someone who achieved great (secular) success without (to my knowledge) seriously compromising his LDS beliefs.

Well, other than the 'working on Sundays' thing, that is...

Speaking of which, we might also bring up the not-quite-as-famous, but still relatively well-known story in LDS circles of Eli Herring who turned down possible NFL fame and fortune simply because...he didn't want to work on Sundays.

Is there a contradiction here?  In an alternate universe where Steve Young made the same decision as Bro.Herring, there would have been no NFL career, no Hall of Fame induction, and no Super Bowl MVP.  And, no high-profile 'ambassador' for the Church who would serve as a role-model for other LDS youth, and create direct and indirect exposure for the Church in many public ways.

Can we celebrate the 'celebrity' of Steve Young as a famous Mormon, and celebrate the righteous choices made by Eli Herring at the same time, when they, in a sense, directly contradict each other?  Can Latter-Day Saints consistently hold up Eli Herring as an example of following the Spirit over possible fame and fortune, AND simultaneously cheer when Church members do seek after and obtain secular fame and fortune, as they can then become high-profile Church 'representatives' to the world?

(Admittedly we're comparing apples and oranges in a way, because Bro.Herring as an offensive lineman would never have achieved the same level of 'fame' in the NFL compared to a quarterback, regardless of how long or well he performed.  Still...)

Obviously, I'm not saying we shouldn't celebrate the life and career of Steve Young to whatever extent we feel is appropriate, but I wonder if we recognize the irony of saying about Church members on one hand, "That's great that they eschew fame and fortune in lieu of living a humble, Christ-centered life." and on the other hand, "It's just too bad they're not more famous so people can SEE them leading a humble, Christ-centered life."

Print | posted on Monday, February 25, 2008 1:25 PM | Filed Under [ The Baron ]

Comments:

#1: Doc

I think the real danger here is for us to think we know what a member faced with that kind of decision should do. I have to believe this would be a matter of prayer and a very personal decision. While I see the irony, I can still applaud both.
2/25/2008 8:37 PM

#2: MrFroggie

Are we so legalistic in our approach to choices between right and wrong that in order for one to be the right choice the other must be wrong. Even the Good, Better, or Best approach leaves us wondering which is best. I don't think we should evaluate the decisions of others so closely except in the rare case we are called to do so. Not only is it voyeuristic, it leads to the "keep up with the Joneses" approach to spiritual living. Our spiritual journey should be personal. When we look to others as an example we will find not only that our situation is crucially different but that sometimes our heros make mistakes we can ill afford to emulate. These mistakes can have to unfortunate effect of appearing to invalidate the good works done previously. Of course, the savior, would be the exception.

Of course, in our world of celebrity worship, in and out of the church, I know how this will play out.
3/12/2008 10:20 AM

Post Comment:

Name  
Email
Url
Comment   
Please add 3 and 2 and type the answer here:

Powered by: