My Links

Bloggernacle Links

  • Mormon Archipelago
  • Mormon Blogs
  • LDSelect
  • LDS Blogs

Article Categories

Post Categories

Archives

Other LDS Blogs

Our Individual Blogs

What's in a name?

By: Starfoxy

So, FMH is having another of their infamous sex talks. One anonymous commenter asked about how to react when a small child explores his/her own body during bath time. (The only advice to be found from the church says to neither encourage nor discourage such explorations. The child will explore and come to the conclusion that the genitals are, like the rest of the body, good.)  I mentioned in a response to this commenter that there is a pamphlet put out by the church that encourages parents to use proper names when discussing body parts. I also mentioned in my comment that the use of proper names for body parts is something about which I feel very strongly.

More and more frequently I see meaningful symbolism in the body being associated with the feminine, and the spirit being associated with the masculine. The creation story is rich with this sort symbolism. We all know that there were first spirits, and then bodies were created for the spirits to dwell in in just as Adam was first and then Eve was created to be with Adam. Adam was created from the dust (male = spirit), and Eve was created from (Adam's) flesh (female = body).  Even in the motherhood/priesthood equivalency (which I'm not completely sold on) the idea that creating and nurturing a body is a moral duty comparable to the Priesthood duty of nurturing spirits places women in the realm of flesh and men in the realm of spirits.

This sort of symbolism, and division of duties makes me very sensitive to the ways bodies are spoken of and referred to. My belief in the independent and equal value of women has made me rethink the way I view my body.  I firmly reject the pervasive protestant notion that the body is inherently base, I think that belief in a corporeal God mandates this. I also reject the more subtle notion that that makes 'me' into my spirit, and turns my body into nothing more than a tool that my spirit uses.  I have come to believe that my body is not a clumsy tool that my spirit must subdue, but is part of who I am.

Related to the puritanical shame about the body the wider US and western culture discourages physical enjoyment of one's own body for men and women (but especially women). Things like eating, sex, and recreational activity are layered with shame, guilt, and arbitrary self-regulations. All of this shame (even some that comes from the medical community) has little or nothing to do with actual health, and everything to do with fear of the body.

So what does all of this have to with avoiding euphemisms? Fear of the name of a thing increases fear of the thing itself. (Hooray for Dumbledore!) When you refer to your, your spouse's, or your child's genitals  as 'you know who what' you communicate shame, fear, and embarrassment. Every time you use a euphemism you reinforce to yourself and those around you the negative feelings that are already there.

For all the reasons I outlined above I feel that use of proper names, and candid discussion (preferably without embarrassed pauses) confirms to children that the body is magnificent. Use of proper names removes the shroud of secrecy and embarrassment. This clears the way for good self esteem, and allows for the development of healthy relationships with food, and sex. I feel that this is good for everyone, especially for women because it is clear to me that shame about the body is pervasive among women in a way it is not among men. I also believe that proper respect for the body, what it is capable of, it's purpose and importance, will translate into improved respect for women's abilities and duties. 

Print | posted on Thursday, February 28, 2008 3:55 PM | Filed Under [ Starfoxy ]

Comments:

#1: ESO

Nice title1

A family in my ward uses exact names for body parts and teaches them early. At playgroup, the 2 year old daughter generally inspects any baby whose diaper is being changed to announce that Jack has a penis so he must be a boy and Jill is a girl because she has a vagina like me and my mom. I think that is great and I sincerely hope these kids grow up loving their bodies. I can understand why people might not love the siblings talking body parts in Sacrament Meeting, which I have overheard. What can we say? Bodies ARE fascinating.
2/28/2008 5:47 PM

#2: Stady Canton

Starfoxy, your thoughts have me rethinking my own body views--it appears my opinions haven't changed much since I discovered I have a spirit too.

I'm with you 100% when it comes to proper body part name usage. We do find it necessary to address slang terms that come around so our children have an idea of what Billy means when he says he was kicked in the coin purse or why Billy shouldn't be touching Susie's jugs.

An honest and open approach can be somewhat startling to other people, though, and I'm still working on how to best deal with any discomfort. When my 3 year old asked our home teacher why the doll in his toybox didn't have nipples I just kind of chuckled and let him fumble his way through that one.

2/28/2008 6:22 PM

#3: Eric Nielson

Excellent post Starfoxy.

Your general approach here seems to be this - our bodies are not evil, so we should feel comfortable talking about them, and this will lead to helthier attitudes. I really do not have much of a problem with this, but what about the opposite (and also valid) approach?

Something like - our bodies are sacred, so like other sacred things we should not talk about them very much, and be careful about how freely we use the names associated with them. We are not supposed to use the names of deity very much, we don't even know the name of Heavenly Mother, we are not supposed to talk about many things in the temple. So it seems to me we should be careful about how often and how freely we use the names of sacred things.

What are your thought of this? We are sometimes protective of names that are important to us. Which might explain blogging handles. How do we decide when to protect certain names?
2/29/2008 6:35 AM

#4: Starfoxy

Eric, that is a good question and a convincing argument. Let me edit your argument to highlight some important distinctions (my additions/changes are in bold):

We should not talk about [sacred things] very much, and [should] be careful about how casually we use the names associated with them. We are not supposed to use the names of deity very casually. (I think the claim that we don't speak about Heavenly Mother because she is just too sacred is a load of hooey, so this bit doesn't convince me). We are not supposed to talk about many things [that happen in] the temple outside of the temple. So it seems to me we should be careful about where and how casually we use the names of sacred things.


You'll note that I replaced every instance of 'freely' with 'casually.' One can (and might I say should) have a free, comfortable, and open relationship with deity without sliding into casualness and disrespect. Needless frequency can lead to casual disrespect but the two are not the same.

Another major point to be had here is that we actually are supposed to discuss the sacred things of the temple very frequently, we just need to be in the temple to do it. This means that we should be spending more time in the temple rather than less time discussing sacred things. I'm perfectly alright with the idea that parents and children should not be discussing the intricacies of human reproduction wherever and whenever. However, if one's home (and family car) is, like the Temple, a place where the spirit can be felt, then reasonably frequent candid and respectful discussion of body parts is perfectly appropriate.
2/29/2008 10:41 AM

#5: Eric Nielson

Were you an editor in a past life? I could use one....nice job.

I think your distinction between free and casual is good, and I appreciate you charitably filling in the blanks due to my weakness in writing. I wish I was better at that sort of thing - and that others were as well.

So, feel free to edit my awkward communications anytime. I don't think we have any major disagreements here.
2/29/2008 12:36 PM

Post Comment:

Name  
Email
Url
Comment   
Please add 7 and 2 and type the answer here:

Powered by: